MP32 powerramp candidate

SPRFMO

South Pacific Regional Fisheries Management Organisation
Jack Mackerel Candidate Management Procedures
MP32: All-index Powerramp Candidate

Status: advanced candidate in the current jmMSE analysis. MP32 has not been adopted. This page reflects the exact jmMSE version 94d4d325ba46220f56097b3de90824c83b7cf3cd and the 25 July 2026 presentation.

1 Identity

Component Current definition
Name in the jmMSE analysis tun32, labelled MP32
Stock/index indicator cpues.ind
Indices Chile_AcousN, Chile_CPUE, Peru_Artis, Peru_Ind, Offshore_CPUE
Reference years 2019-2023
Recent-data window 3 years
How the indices are combined Mean (combine = "mean", metric = "mean")
Harvest control rule Power ramp (powerramp.hcr)
Output Catch
Catch allocation Split among fisheries using their average catch proportions over the last five years (split.is)

2 Harvest control rule parameters

Parameter Value
Minimum catch, min 270
Limit metric, lim 0.1
Trigger metric 1.42
Target catch 1500
Initial catch for constraints 1385
Maximum annual decrease multiplier, dlow 0.85
Maximum annual increase multiplier, dupp 1.20

3 Rule

Let \(I_t\) be the annual mean of the standardized index information and

\[ x_t = \frac{I_t-0.1}{1.42-0.1}. \]

Before applying the annual change limit, the current power-ramp rule calculates the catch recommendation as

\[ C_t^* = \begin{cases} 270, & I_t \le 0.1,\\ 270 + (1500-270)x_t^{2.5}, & 0.1 < I_t < 1.42,\\ 1500(0.2+0.8x_t)^{0.6}, & I_t \ge 1.42. \end{cases} \]

Unlike a capped hockeystick, the upper branch continues to rise above the trigger. The annual change rule then prevents the result from falling below 85% or rising above 120% of the previous recommendation. For the first application year, the reference value is 1385.

4 Evidence status

The July presentation identifies MP32 as the optimal powerramp minimum/limit run. The MP29-MP32 comparison reports broadly similar long-term catch and stock performance, with MP32 showing more year-to-year catch variation (IACC) than MP29. The jmMSE robustness analysis carries both candidates forward.

Primary sources: model_tune.R, model_robustness.R, and the July presentation source.

5 Annual application requirements still to resolve

  • authoritative provider and annual cutoff for each index;
  • precise index standardization performed by cpues.ind and the software version used;
  • treatment of missing or revised indices;
  • catch units and rounding;
  • approved catch-allocation update rule; and
  • exceptional-circumstances review and decision process.