How the MSE work fits together

How the Assessment, MSE, and CMP Documents Fit Together

This page condenses SCW17/Paper-04. It shows where this documentation site fits within the jack mackerel assessment and MSE work.

flowchart TD
  J["JJM assessment configurations"] --> C["Condition operating models"]
  C --> O["Operating models with observation and implementation uncertainty"]
  O --> M["Test CMPs in jmMSE"]
  M --> P["Performance metrics and diagnostics"]
  P --> D["CMP comparison and decision"]
  D --> S["Approved written CMP definition in jmMSE26"]
  S --> Y["Apply the CMP when new annual data arrive"]
  Y --> V["Save the data, calculations, and advice"]

Layer	Responsibility
JJM	Assessment-conditioned stock and fishery dynamics
`jjmR` / `FLjjm`	Transfer JJM assessment results into the MSE framework
FLR / `mse` / `msemodules`	General software used to run projections and management procedures
`jmMSE`	Defines operating models and CMPs, runs simulations, and calculates performance
`jmMSE26`	Reviewed specifications, selection evidence, and application instructions

1 Separation of responsibilities

jmMSE26 is the documentation and application guide; it is not a separate MSE model. Any calculation examples here must point to an exact saved version of jmMSE. Operating models, recruitment and movement assumptions, reference points, and performance measures remain defined in their scientific source repositories.

2 Reproducibility chain

Every performance claim should identify the operating models, CMP version, number of simulation replicates, treatment of random variation, projection period, performance-measure definition, saved results, and exact analysis version. Every annual application should identify the data revision used and the adopted CMP version.

---
title: "How the MSE work fits together"
---

{{< include ../_includes/sprfmo-banner.qmd >}}

<div class="paper-title">How the Assessment, MSE, and CMP Documents Fit Together</div>

This page condenses SCW17/Paper-04. It shows where this documentation site fits
within the jack mackerel assessment and MSE work.

```{mermaid}
flowchart TD
  J["JJM assessment configurations"] --> C["Condition operating models"]
  C --> O["Operating models with observation and implementation uncertainty"]
  O --> M["Test CMPs in jmMSE"]
  M --> P["Performance metrics and diagnostics"]
  P --> D["CMP comparison and decision"]
  D --> S["Approved written CMP definition in jmMSE26"]
  S --> Y["Apply the CMP when new annual data arrive"]
  Y --> V["Save the data, calculations, and advice"]
```

| Layer | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| JJM | Assessment-conditioned stock and fishery dynamics |
| `jjmR` / `FLjjm` | Transfer JJM assessment results into the MSE framework |
| FLR / `mse` / `msemodules` | General software used to run projections and management procedures |
| `jmMSE` | Defines operating models and CMPs, runs simulations, and calculates performance |
| `jmMSE26` | Reviewed specifications, selection evidence, and application instructions |

## Separation of responsibilities

`jmMSE26` is the documentation and application guide; it is not a separate MSE
model. Any calculation examples here must point to an exact saved version of
`jmMSE`. Operating models, recruitment and movement assumptions, reference
points, and performance measures remain defined in their scientific source
repositories.

## Reproducibility chain

Every performance claim should identify the operating models, CMP version,
number of simulation replicates, treatment of random variation, projection
period, performance-measure definition, saved results, and exact analysis
version. Every annual application should identify the data revision used and
the adopted CMP version.